Re: Minimum Unit Size
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 3:39 am
All,
The United States Army has never had regional or Ststes-named units. The Continental Army did, but not the US Government. During the ACW, the units with States names were not part of the regular US Army. They were United States VOLUNTEER (or USV) regiments accepted into Federal service. As you will all recall, there were US Army regiments in the Army of the Potomac (the 5th. Corps springs to mind.) The Southern Regiments were obviously not going to be accepted into the US Armiy's roster - they were units in an Army formerly in rebellion against the US Federal Government. (To paraphrase Capt. Malcolm Reynolds - They were on the side that lost, not necessarily the wrong side.) Please note also that NONE of the USV Regiments were taken into the US Army after the war. As far as I know, they were all disbanded. During the next allegedly major war - The Spanish-American War, Volunteer units were again raised, (Teddy Roosevelts Rough Riders, 79th. New York Infantry, etc.), and disbanded after the fighting was over. Let it be remembered that many former Confederate officers and men joined the colors, (Joe Wheeler being a prime example), to fight the Spanish, with no apparent ill will involved.
Jack B)
Just as a side note - about 15 or 20 years ago, the US Army did experiment with a "Home regiment" type of organization. The idea was, if someone in the Army wanted to, they could spend thier entire career in one regiment. Maybe not the same Battalion, but the same Regiment. The idea was to establish cohesion and comradiere. Sort of like the Brits used to do, and maybe still do, for all I know. I have no idea if this is still going on.
The United States Army has never had regional or Ststes-named units. The Continental Army did, but not the US Government. During the ACW, the units with States names were not part of the regular US Army. They were United States VOLUNTEER (or USV) regiments accepted into Federal service. As you will all recall, there were US Army regiments in the Army of the Potomac (the 5th. Corps springs to mind.) The Southern Regiments were obviously not going to be accepted into the US Armiy's roster - they were units in an Army formerly in rebellion against the US Federal Government. (To paraphrase Capt. Malcolm Reynolds - They were on the side that lost, not necessarily the wrong side.) Please note also that NONE of the USV Regiments were taken into the US Army after the war. As far as I know, they were all disbanded. During the next allegedly major war - The Spanish-American War, Volunteer units were again raised, (Teddy Roosevelts Rough Riders, 79th. New York Infantry, etc.), and disbanded after the fighting was over. Let it be remembered that many former Confederate officers and men joined the colors, (Joe Wheeler being a prime example), to fight the Spanish, with no apparent ill will involved.
Jack B)
Just as a side note - about 15 or 20 years ago, the US Army did experiment with a "Home regiment" type of organization. The idea was, if someone in the Army wanted to, they could spend thier entire career in one regiment. Maybe not the same Battalion, but the same Regiment. The idea was to establish cohesion and comradiere. Sort of like the Brits used to do, and maybe still do, for all I know. I have no idea if this is still going on.