Progress Report

[norb]

MadMan wrote:

This one goes out to all you great guys coding your hearts out.

Code Monkey

I guess that's me. Thanks

[Hancock the Superb]

Same thanks to you too!

[Monty]

Hi all. Long time 2nd Mannassaser, first time poster. I'll finish introducing myself by saying that until I bought TC2M, Sid Meier's Gettysburg had remained on my (paltry) hard drive since c. 1998.


I can't wait for the game, I know I can get at least two of my friends to purchase the game and join me online. I think the first thing we'll do is (if possible) take a rebel corps each and fight the whole battle against the Yankee AI.

Anyway, I thought I would just post to note the somewhat odd way of dispelling what little speculation remained of the focus of the game by posting the sources you're using.

[estabu2]

Welcome Monty!!!

[Ralph]

Really looking forward to this game. I will push the ACW club hard to accept this new game for club play. Since after years of only HPS games allowed the club has approved two new strategic level games I would hope they will approve a potential "real time" game. As far as I am concerned a game like this could bring the club together with live combat.

Regards

Gen Pete
founding member ACW club 1997

[norb]

Monty wrote:

Anyway, I thought I would just post to note the somewhat odd way of dispelling what little speculation remained of the focus of the game by posting the sources you're using.

huh? :whistle:

[tim]

Ralph wrote:

Really looking forward to this game. I will push the ACW club hard to accept this new game for club play. Since after years of only HPS games allowed the club has approved two new strategic level games I would hope they will approve a potential "real time" game. As far as I am concerned a game like this could bring the club together with live combat.

Regards

Gen Pete
founding member ACW club 1997

Do you have a website? Sounds interesting - I haven't heard of the ACW club before. Is it like a virtual wargames club (for ACW obviously)

[estabu2]

norb wrote:

Monty wrote:

Anyway, I thought I would just post to note the somewhat odd way of dispelling what little speculation remained of the focus of the game by posting the sources you're using.

huh? :whistle:

I am positive they are using historical sources:P:P that should pretty much clear that up.:silly: :silly: B)

[JC Edwards]

norb wrote:

Monty wrote:

Anyway, I thought I would just post to note the somewhat odd way of dispelling what little speculation remained of the focus of the game by posting the sources you're using.

huh? :whistle:

Exactly!

[69th NYSV]

Speculation" Pffftt...It's been noted that it's a famous battle in the ACW. :dry: