Page 3 of 3

Re: About the game performance

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 11:37 pm
by Iriasthor
I think people is mixing things here:
The obvious solution for the fps complaint is rather obvious. Norb needs to put a switch in the options page titled Prefer High FPS. That will reduce the AI loops accordingly so that it insures a minimum 60 fps. That way the first person shooter types can have exactly what they like and stop the incessant whining.
The point is not to reduce the game quality by reducing, as in your example, the AI loops for the sake of a little FPS improvement. The game should be left as it is and even improved with more functionalities. My point is that an improvement in performance is always a good new, and I think that the developers should work on this matter just as much as on other aspects of the game.

Who wouldn't prefer playing at 60-FPS rather than at 10-FPS?
I would not object to an improvement in FPS, but I prefer SDK, reinforcements in campaign mode etc. first.
Of course, there might be a wide variety of opinion regarding this aspect. I think it all comes up to one's preferences. While for some people a performance improvement is a must and urgent matter (due to a very very low FPS rate, for example), other people like you (and me) might think that adding game features is a more important aspect of the game to work on right now.

As a side note, I think all the opinions are to be equally respected by everyone, as I've seen some heated up answers in this and other threads (from both sides).

Re: About the game performance

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 3:35 am
by Jim
Norb's number one complaint: "Every time I speed things up the team puts in more stuff and slows it down again." :whistle:


-Jim