NAVAL ASSETS
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:45 pm
In future games might there be Naval assets?
Page 1 of 2
Re: NAVAL ASSETS
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:08 pm
If we do shiloh, we would have to have them.
Re:NAVAL ASSETS
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:19 pm
That would be pretty cool! Just imagine a Malvern Hill (even though the gunboats did so little), or Ft D. (whatever, in Tennessee), Port Hudson, etc.
Re:NAVAL ASSETS
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:59 pm
Hancock the Superb wrote:
Fort Donnelson?That would be pretty cool! Just imagine a Malvern Hill (even though the gunboats did so little), or Ft D. (whatever, in Tennessee), Port Hudson, etc.
Re: NAVAL ASSETS
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:18 am
norb wrote:
Glad to hear your still thinking about Shiloh!If we do shiloh, we would have to have them.
Re:NAVAL ASSETS
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:20 am
What about Fort Fisher? That would be super awesome.
Re:NAVAL ASSETS
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:43 pm
or a vicksburg siege campaign
Re:NAVAL ASSETS
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:05 pm
Badger wrote:
That's high up on my list too.or a vicksburg siege campaign
Re:NAVAL ASSETS
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:32 am
It would be great if SOW would expand to include naval engagements as well!
Re:NAVAL ASSETS
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:33 pm
I know that pontoons are not naval. Can;t help notice they were used preceeding a # of battles, as well as afterwards. Would pontoons be in future games (by player choise of location)?