Attack Columns
Re:Attack Columns
The traditional view is that the English Army usually prevailed over the French Army because the English preferred the line, especially on defense. This allowed every musket in the unit to fire. The French preferred to attack in the Attack Column which was in the ACW referred to as a column of regiments. The weakness to this formation is that only the front regiment can fire and the rest are masked. If the defenders can maintain an adequate rate of fire, then they can ruin an attack by all but the most elite of troops. This is because a brigade defending is essentially concentrating all of its fire on a single regiment of the attacking brigade.
If you are interested in an in depth study of battle tactics for either the ACW or the NW, check out the books by Brent Nosworthy.
-Jim
If you are interested in an in depth study of battle tactics for either the ACW or the NW, check out the books by Brent Nosworthy.
-Jim
"My God, if we've not got a cool brain and a big one too, to manage this affair, the nation is ruined forever." Unknown private, 14th Vermont, 2 July 1863
Re:Attack Columns
Jim
What configuration made up the "column of regiments"?
Line
attack attack attack attack
What I had in mind is.
attack attack attack attack attack
cuz when getting somewhere north of 100 yds I would go TC'd double quick brigade or go into charge.
Not leaving allot of time for defensive volleys. Have regiments or a brigade in reserve moving up to be ready to exploit breaks in defense.
HM4
What configuration made up the "column of regiments"?
Line
attack attack attack attack
What I had in mind is.
attack attack attack attack attack
cuz when getting somewhere north of 100 yds I would go TC'd double quick brigade or go into charge.
Not leaving allot of time for defensive volleys. Have regiments or a brigade in reserve moving up to be ready to exploit breaks in defense.
HM4
Last edited by BOSTON on Wed May 13, 2009 5:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
HOISTINGMAN4
Drafted in Boston
Drafted in Boston
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:27 am
Re:Attack Columns
hoistingman4 wrote:
In the Peninsula War, the French Column did not once beat a British Line. Places like Barossa, and Bussaco became infamous for the British lines standing up against the French columns. The former included a British brigade sized force under General Thomas Graham forming lines against two divisions of French infantry. The British won with 1,200 casualties vs the 3,000 or so French. At Bussaco the Duke of Wellington formed his entire coalition of British, Spanish and Portuguese on a high ridge and the French Marshall Massena tried to pummel Wellington back with column; it didn't work.You had me worried that you were an English pedigree. :laugh: The English army has an excellant reputation, it wasn't till when SM Waterloo came out that, and read that Napoleon had a different view, with less respect for the English Army, for the reasons you are quoted as saying. Are you keeping an eye on what Histwar is doing?
One other thing,
do you know if the French were using the Attack Column on the English field fortification with any success during the Peninsula Camgpain?
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.
Re:Attack Columns
AG
I read that the British had extensive field fortifications and that Massena gave up on attacking them. Again, a good case for having preparing a good defense. What was the final out-come of the Peninsula War?
HM4
I read that the British had extensive field fortifications and that Massena gave up on attacking them. Again, a good case for having preparing a good defense. What was the final out-come of the Peninsula War?
HM4
HOISTINGMAN4
Drafted in Boston
Drafted in Boston
Re:Attack Columns
French retreat into France.
Re:Attack Columns
bedbug wrote:
HM4
Just went back to your "First Impression Article", which is still cool , and had to wonder if your SS were based on the Peninsula War. Is that a subject you might be considering on doing a mod of?French retreat into France.
HM4
HOISTINGMAN4
Drafted in Boston
Drafted in Boston
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:27 am
Re:Attack Columns
hoistingman4 wrote:
Bedbug was correct, the French retreated into France, Wellington followed, the last battle of the Peninsula War was Toulouse. Napoleon was exiled, escaped later, went back to France, and thus Waterloo was transformed from just a small town in Belgium to one of the greatest face-offs in warfare.AG
I read that the British had extensive field fortifications and that Massena gave up on attacking them. Again, a good case for having preparing a good defense. What was the final out-come of the Peninsula War?
HM4
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.
Re:Attack Columns
Toulouse is way down in southern France, Why would Napoleon throw in the towel then?
HOISTINGMAN4
Drafted in Boston
Drafted in Boston
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:27 am
Re:Attack Columns
hoistingman4 wrote:
Napoleon wasn't commanding in Toulouse, Marshall Soult was. Napoleon was up in Northern France, fighting off more Allies advancing, I believe it was the Prussians, could be wrong. An attack by the British, Spanish and Portuguese carried the defensive fortifications guarding the town, but hundreds were killed in the unnecessary attacks; Napoleon had already surrendered. Word had yet to reach Toulouse, which is why the attacks were carried out.Toulouse is way down in southern France, Why would Napoleon throw in the towel then?
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.