Battle 191

[Garnier]

Apparently the battle results for 191 got counted twice. I suppose this could happen if the host recorded it, and then opened the launcher again and recorded it a second time while the first was still going, or if the first failed halfway through and they restarted it. In any case, the results were recorded on all your divisions, and then recorded again.

I'll see if I can get the backup temporary division files from Snell and stick them in for you guys.

[KG_Soldier]

Yeah. . . I recorded it, but it didn't show up right away, so I hit record again. I'll send you the file when I get home this evening.

[SouthernSteel]

Did it affect the stats we saw posted, or the turn you ran since then?

[Garnier]

Both.

I didn't notice the discrepancy til after I ran turn 16.

So when snell gives me the backups, the players that were in this battle will lose their turn 16 results I just generated, so I will run turn 16 again just for those players.

This won't happen again, I've made it so after you hit record there's no hitting record again. It can sometimes take a little time as it has to make a connection to download and upload all the files from the server.

[SouthernSteel]

:unsure: So basically what you're saying is Snell tried to sabotage your program and the internets? :dry:

Maybe the mystery of my 78 man 4th Texas will finally be explained, as well as that of my untouchable 3rd Texas. If their record stands though, I think it ought to be put on a plaque or something.

[KG_Soldier]

Yes. . . you got me. I was so upset with Willard that I recorded the battle twice so he would lose more men.

[SouthernSteel]

And Seal as well. The married couple must be punished together.

[Garnier]

When I first saw Seal's regiments with negative men I was like "uh oh!". But then I was like "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA this is so hilarious!"

EDIT:

Snell sent me the backups so the divisions involved are back to the results of the first recording of the battle, and their turn 16 has been done.