I’ve been experimenting with the OOBs to increase the number of wagons per division from 1 to 5. I think this has three advantages:
(a) It’s more historical. The 110,000 man Army of the Potomac had over 1,800 wagons in 1862, or approximately 35 per 5,000 men, rather than the 1 per 5,000 represented in the basic game. At a ratio of 4:1 that 5 wagons equates to about 20, which is a lot closer.
(b) These 5-wagon groups seem to be a little more vulnerable to capture, as they cannot respond so quickly to threats, which is I think as it should be.
(c) A wagon train looks more authentic than a single wagon.........at least to me.
If you fancy trying this, it’s quite easy. Just increase the headcount column from 10 to 75 for each wagon unit. 5 wagons appears to be the limit however. If you go to any headcount number above 75, you do get a sixth wagon, but no horses to go with it!
Martin
More realistic supply trains
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:23 pm
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1830
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:37 am
Re: More realistic supply trains
Must be the Chuck Wagon! :laugh:If you go to any headcount number above 75, you do get a sixth wagon, but no horses to go with it!
Martin
'The path that is not seen, nor hidden, should always be flanked'
Re: More realistic supply trains
If you play around with the formation file you could also introduce a cavalry escort this was something that was experimented with on TC2M - I think it was davinci - his pet hate at the moment is the supply wagons as they can be rather suicidal diving infront of the action in between firefights!!!I’ve been experimenting with the OOBs to increase the number of wagons per division from 1 to 5. I think this has three advantages:
(a) It’s more historical. The 110,000 man Army of the Potomac had over 1,800 wagons in 1862, or approximately 35 per 5,000 men, rather than the 1 per 5,000 represented in the basic game. At a ratio of 4:1 that 5 wagons equates to about 20, which is a lot closer.
(b) These 5-wagon groups seem to be a little more vulnerable to capture, as they cannot respond so quickly to threats, which is I think as it should be.
(c) A wagon train looks more authentic than a single wagon.........at least to me.
If you fancy trying this, it’s quite easy. Just increase the headcount column from 10 to 75 for each wagon unit. 5 wagons appears to be the limit however. If you go to any headcount number above 75, you do get a sixth wagon, but no horses to go with it!
Martin
I only know two tunes...One's "Yankee Doodle" and the other one isn't!
Ulysses S. Grant
Ulysses S. Grant
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:23 pm
Re: More realistic supply trains
Yes, I admit there's is a tension between making them more vulnerable and their sometimes strange behavior.
I tend to TC them if they are under my command, and then park them somewhere. Always a bit dangerous, but again I think pretty historical. Locating the wagons was something commanders gave some thought to before the battle, but I suspect not a lot during it, there being other things on their mind.
I got the numbers wrong in my original post btw. Based on McClellan's 1862 orbat, it should be about 80 wagons per 5,000 men, not 35.
Martin
I tend to TC them if they are under my command, and then park them somewhere. Always a bit dangerous, but again I think pretty historical. Locating the wagons was something commanders gave some thought to before the battle, but I suspect not a lot during it, there being other things on their mind.
I got the numbers wrong in my original post btw. Based on McClellan's 1862 orbat, it should be about 80 wagons per 5,000 men, not 35.
Martin