corp commands

[Jim]

ironsight wrote:

Jim, thats good to hear as far as fellow commanders not under the player's control. However for the Division commanders under the player's control, will HOLD actually and really mean HOLD or will they disobey and wrecklessly go suicidal anyhow?

We are adding a new command: Hold at All Costs, which if it works as intended will mean that the unit will darn well stay there, with local adjustments only, unless routed.

This is one of a number of items on the AI upgrade list that we will be working on.

-Jim

[ironsight]

Jim, Hold at all costs! Great!
Make sure Skippy#2 tests it out real good!:laugh:

[JC Edwards]

ironsight wrote:

Jim, Hold at all costs! Great!
Make sure Skippy#2 tests it out real good!:laugh:

You better get yourself some satellite there skippy or all you'll be getting is Peter Pan HardTack!:lol:

[ironsight]

JC Wrote:You better get yourself some satellite there skippy or all you'll be getting is Peter Pan HardTack!

You'd better test the new HOLD command real good!!:P

If there's just one bug....
your gonna end up the same color of that there skippy peanut butter!!:laugh:

[JC Edwards]

ironsight wrote:

JC Wrote:You better get yourself some satellite there skippy or all you'll be getting is Peter Pan HardTack!

You'd better test the new HOLD command real good!!:P

If there's just one bug....
your gonna end up the same color of that there skippy peanut butter!!:laugh:

Got any Welch's Grape Jelly to go with them Peanut Butter fittin' words?!:cheer:

jb hood

Sir

I've mentioned this to Norb more than a few times that, from scratch, he created the best AI I've ever encountered in TC2M......rest assured that with Gettysburg, he will capitalize on that.

JC

[jb hood]

thanks jc

i´m sure that the designers will do what they can to deliver us the 3 rd part of the best tactical war game ever made.