Now this is one I really agree with. It may seem a minor thing, but the friends I play with and I enjoy looking over the detailed stats for losses, casualties inflicted, etc.1. A detailed breakdown of losses/kills for your units after battle.
Who did well and deserves praise,- and who failed and ran for home...
Only getting "X points" without any details, after an hour-long battle with 10.000s of soldiers, is NOT satisfying.
Things that should be in the first patch...
- cliometrician
- Reactions:
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:01 am
- Location: East Texas
Re: Things that should be in the first patch...
Major Damage wrote:
"I may have fought on the side that was wrong, but I fought on the right side." John S. Mosby
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 4:49 am
Re: Things that should be in the first patch...
Its a curious omission because SoW:GB had it.
HITS & Couriers - a different and realistic way to play SoW MP.
Re: Things that should be in the first patch...
I read somewhere that it will be implemented, just isn't right now. But you can always hit return to battle from the end screen and then look at the unit stats.Its a curious omission because SoW:GB had it.
As for the generals dying and courier notice being discussed above, I just chalk it up to battlefield confusion. But if you want to keep tabs on who is alive, a) look in the OOB screen, or b) use the arrow keys to scroll through your commanders and see who is dead/different. Not that hard.
CWGII -> SMG -> SMA -> WNLB -> ANGV -> TC -> TC2M -> SOW