Single Play

Let's talk about Gettysburg! Put your questions and comments here.
ironsight
Reactions:
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:27 pm

Re:Single Play

Post by ironsight »

Hey guys, i looked into satellite and quite frankly i wasn't impressed at least with the ones out here. Not only will it cost an extra $70 to $100/mo. but because of the built in latency delays, all of em say its NOT recommended for on line games. Further, unless one is willing to spend lets say a $100/mo. on a premium package, the througput bit rates are NOT gauranteed during high peak demand times for the $70/mo packages. In addition, interruptions can occur during inclement wheather conditions.
Its OK for downloading big files but thats about it far as i can tell.

Forget it! I'm already paying for satellite DishTV, telephone, ISP dialup, electric and propane. Also i'm not crazy about the idea to install a network driver/HW in my PC to support satellite internett access.

I'm quite content :dry: to play against the AI, hopefully it'll be a little better in the new game.
User avatar
Little Powell
Reactions:
Posts: 4884
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:25 am

Re:Single Play

Post by Little Powell »

ironsight wrote:
Hey guys, i looked into satellite and quite frankly i wasn't impressed at least with the ones out here. Not only will it cost an extra $70 to $100/mo. but because of the built in latency delays, all of em say its NOT recommended for on line games. Further, unless one is willing to spend lets say a $100/mo. on a premium package, the througput bit rates are NOT gauranteed during high peak demand times for the $70/mo packages. In addition, interruptions can occur during inclement wheather conditions.
Its OK for downloading big files but thats about it far as i can tell.

Forget it! I'm already paying for satellite DishTV, telephone, ISP dialup, electric and propane. Also i'm not crazy about the idea to install a network driver/HW in my PC to support satellite internett access.

I'm quite content :dry: to play against the AI, hopefully it'll be a little better in the new game.
Yeah, from what I'm seeing so far I think playing single player will still be awesome for you. The 20 scenario's, open play, and plus the possibilities for mods/custom scenario's. I know for a fact that I'll be creating scenario's. And heck, maybe you can find another gamer to play a local area network game with you (son/daughter, friend, spouse). :)
Chamberlain
Reactions:
Posts: 1163
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 6:39 pm

Re:Single Play

Post by Chamberlain »

JC Edwards wrote:
Yeah but we decided to put a "BAYONETS!!!" clause for anything that has to do with the Little Round Top for anybody named "Chamberlain".:lol: :lol: :P
Hey JC,

So, if I do not have Bayonets !!!!!, then I will yell 'Grenades' on LRT !!!!

:laugh: :laugh:

Chamberlain
-Col. Joshua Chamberlain, 20th Maine

We cannot retreat. We cannot withdraw. We are going to have to be stubborn today
JC Edwards
Reactions:
Posts: 1830
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:37 am

Re:Single Play

Post by JC Edwards »

Chamberlain wrote:
JC Edwards wrote:
Yeah but we decided to put a "BAYONETS!!!" clause for anything that has to do with the Little Round Top for anybody named "Chamberlain".:lol: :lol: :P
Hey JC,

So, if I do not have Bayonets !!!!!, then I will yell 'Grenades' on LRT !!!!

:laugh: :laugh:

Chamberlain
I guarantee that if you yell "JAMESON!!!", you'll get more points.:cheer:
'The path that is not seen, nor hidden, should always be flanked'
Chamberlain
Reactions:
Posts: 1163
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 6:39 pm

Re:Single Play

Post by Chamberlain »

JC Edwards wrote:
Chamberlain wrote:
JC Edwards wrote:
Yeah but we decided to put a "BAYONETS!!!" clause for anything that has to do with the Little Round Top for anybody named "Chamberlain".:lol: :lol: :P
Hey JC,

So, if I do not have Bayonets !!!!!, then I will yell 'Grenades' on LRT !!!!

:laugh: :laugh:

Chamberlain
I guarantee that if you yell "JAMESON!!!", you'll get more points.:cheer:
JC,

You are right, my Friend !!!!!

That will work !!!!

:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:

Chamberlain
-Col. Joshua Chamberlain, 20th Maine

We cannot retreat. We cannot withdraw. We are going to have to be stubborn today
Meach
Reactions:
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:59 pm

Re:Single Play

Post by Meach »

I firmly hope to get my wife hooked so we can sit next to each other and have battles. I was bored so set up a home network for me and the missus. Failing that I will just have to amuse myself with the sandbox for hours on end.

I want to add on another little PC for the kids at somepoint so I can imagine all of us playing a battle together with a giant bowl of popcorn and gallons of soda at hand :)
tim
Reactions:
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:26 am

Re:Single Play

Post by tim »

Meach wrote:
I firmly hope to get my wife hooked so we can sit next to each other and have battles. I was bored so set up a home network for me and the missus. Failing that I will just have to amuse myself with the sandbox for hours on end.

I want to add on another little PC for the kids at somepoint so I can imagine all of us playing a battle together with a giant bowl of popcorn and gallons of soda at hand :)
This probably sounds a bit mad but you could even play against yourself (notice I avoided the term 'with yourself':blink: ). Just start a battle have one side defend the other attack - give orders to the defence and then see if you can break them down or vice versa. Intervene on one side or the other every now and again - maybe set yourself rules like five orders per side for two miutes then over to the other side. Solo wargaming was popular at one time when you issued orders and then picked cards for random events etc. Could be a laugh anyway.
Jim
Reactions:
Posts: 1082
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:53 am

Re:Single Play

Post by Jim »

My daughter tested all of the tutorials for TC2M except for the corps level. She was in 5th grade at the time and had no trouble picking up the basics. She is waiting impatiently for me to draft the GB tutorials so she can test those as well.

-Jim
"My God, if we've not got a cool brain and a big one too, to manage this affair, the nation is ruined forever." Unknown private, 14th Vermont, 2 July 1863
Meach
Reactions:
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:59 pm

Re:Single Play

Post by Meach »

tim wrote:
Meach wrote:
I firmly hope to get my wife hooked so we can sit next to each other and have battles. I was bored so set up a home network for me and the missus. Failing that I will just have to amuse myself with the sandbox for hours on end.

I want to add on another little PC for the kids at somepoint so I can imagine all of us playing a battle together with a giant bowl of popcorn and gallons of soda at hand :)
This probably sounds a bit mad but you could even play against yourself (notice I avoided the term 'with yourself':blink: ). Just start a battle have one side defend the other attack - give orders to the defence and then see if you can break them down or vice versa. Intervene on one side or the other every now and again - maybe set yourself rules like five orders per side for two miutes then over to the other side. Solo wargaming was popular at one time when you issued orders and then picked cards for random events etc. Could be a laugh anyway.
That sounds like a good idea if my tribe let me play in peace :)
Joshua l.Chamberlain
Reactions:
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:12 am

Re:Single Play

Post by Joshua l.Chamberlain »

I have this thing in TC2M where I make scenario where I command both sides and make up all these ideas on how the battle will play out it's fun and it's alot of work commanding both sides but you get used to it.
"There stands Jackson like a stone wall! Let us be determined to die here and we will conquer!"
-Brig.Gen. Bernard Bee, Henry House
Post Reply