Hancock, hero of Gettysburg.

Let's talk about Gettysburg! Put your questions and comments here.
Joshua l.Chamberlain
Reactions:
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:12 am

Hancock, hero of Gettysburg.

Post by Joshua l.Chamberlain »

I believe Maj.Gen. Winnfield Scott Hancock is the real Union hero of Gettysburg not Meade. Hancock was there at many key moments and turned what looked like a defeat into a victory. Of course that is my opinion I want to here everyone else's opinion. So feel free to say what you wish as long as it does not spark a problem.
"There stands Jackson like a stone wall! Let us be determined to die here and we will conquer!"
-Brig.Gen. Bernard Bee, Henry House
Armchair General
Reactions:
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:27 am

Re:Hancock, hero of Gettysburg.

Post by Armchair General »

The army was like a a massive oversized football team- in that you can't rely on any one person, you need the whole team to pull out a win. It helps if you have a great running back, but you also need a quarterback who looks over the entire situation, and a defense that can stop the opponents. Then one of the most important needs would be an offensive line, which would be the private soldiers. Without them and their discipline, the army was nothing. So I think it's hard to point at any one person and say they were the hero of Gettysburg, but Hancock certainly helped.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.
Davinci
Reactions:
Posts: 3034
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:53 pm

Re:Hancock, hero of Gettysburg.

Post by Davinci »

Armchair General , that was very well put, I like the analogy that you used, but if I had to vote on one person, I’ll say that Daniel Sickles altered or changed the whole course of the battle.

Had he not advanced and disrupted General Longstreet there might not have been a Pickett’s charge.

davinci
The only true logic is that, there is no true logic!
Ephrum
Reactions:
Posts: 488
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 7:11 pm

Re:Hancock, hero of Gettysburg.

Post by Ephrum »

I agree that it was a cast of many in the AoP that helped in the victory.

I've read that Hancock's appearence at Cemetery Hill on day1, gave a bit of a morale boost to the troops that had fallen back to that point.


And I agree that Sickles' move to the Peach Orchard/Wheatfield worked out to the Union advantage, even though the move fulfilled Hancock's prediction that they would soon come tumbling back.
OHIO UNIVERSITY
User avatar
RebBugler
Reactions:
Posts: 4252
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:51 am
Location: Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas

Re:Hancock, hero of Gettysburg.

Post by RebBugler »

Not an opinion...FACT! Were it not for Hancock's gathering up of troops and redirecting their positions, Barksdale's Mississippi boys would have severed the Union line along cemetery ridge the 2nd day. Whether the Rebs could have sustained their position is another question, but history proves he was an exceptional leader this day.
Bugles & Flags Gettysburg - Toolbar, Flags, Scenarios, and More...
Armchair General
Reactions:
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:27 am

Re:Hancock, hero of Gettysburg.

Post by Armchair General »

RebBugler wrote:
Not an opinion...FACT! Were it not for Hancock's gathering up of troops and redirecting their positions, Barksdale's Mississippi boys would have severed the Union line along cemetery ridge the 2nd day. Whether the Rebs could have sustained their position is another question, but history proves he was an exceptional leader this day.
I think it was more of a 'FACT' that the 1st Minnesota sacrificed hundreds of lives to give Hancock the few moments to reassemble the lines. The Minnesotans charged an entire brigade, and got hammered, but lasted just long enough
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.
UglyElmo
Reactions:
Posts: 190
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 3:46 pm

Re:Hancock, hero of Gettysburg.

Post by UglyElmo »

There are so many seemingly inconsequential events which turn out to be major turning points in battle, you cannot point to just one event (or man, or unit) and say for fact that was the responsible party for a battles success.

You also have to consider things which were not done, orders not followed, and the inaction of a few officers/soldiers. Even a change in weather or time of day, might have been a turning point.

To say one officer was majorly responsible for winning the battle, would be showing disrespect to the men who had to actually gather the courage to follow his orders, and sacrifice themselves for the greater good of the rest of their fellow soldiers.

Plus, I would say luck is almost always a factor for an army's success.
For any prior or future Ugly's out there, my contact info:
el-marko1@insightbb.com
O. O. Howard
Reactions:
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:36 pm

Re:Hancock, hero of Gettysburg.

Post by O. O. Howard »

I would have to agree with the line of thinking of Armchair General, Ephrum and Ugly Elmo. Hancock was awesome on all three days and most certainly A heroe of Gettsburg. I don't think anyone, however, can claim the title of THE heroe of Gettysburg. There were thousands of them from the high command down to the enlisted men in the battlelines.
Hancock the Superb
Reactions:
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:06 am

Re:Hancock, hero of Gettysburg.

Post by Hancock the Superb »

Excuse me sirs,

I plan to be the hero of Gettysburg, for in multiplayer, once called upon, I shall secure victory!

Thank-you for discussing my fate...prematurely!

There will be no need for any gallant charges! Only flanking moves and lightning attacks and cannister-firing artillery!
Hancock the Superb
Hancock the Superb
Reactions:
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:06 am

Re:Hancock, hero of Gettysburg.

Post by Hancock the Superb »

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Hancock the Superb
Post Reply