Bayonet Charges and Casualties

This is where we discuss anything multiplayer. From strategies, arranging games, to multiplayer related technical help. You will also find tournament and league information here.
Sharpe55
Reactions:
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 5:23 am

Bayonet Charges and Casualties

Post by Sharpe55 »

Thought I would just put this on the forums since we've been talking about it on teamspeak. Is there a way to make it more devastating to the charging regiment(s)?

What I mean is this:
As the charging regiment gets closer to the regiment it is charging, souldn't they begin to take a lot more casualties and possibly a morale penalty as a result. I think this would be a good way to limit the effectiveness of mass frontal bayonet charges.

Obviously there are times and places for bayonet charges but some of the ones in multiplayer are just ridiculous sometimes. If they get cut down faster as they are charging in (especially if they are crossing a creek or up a hill) this should be a good deterrent to this tactic I think

Discuss :)
DavidAcheson140PVI
Reactions:
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:09 am

Re: Bayonet Charges and Casualties

Post by DavidAcheson140PVI »

I think Seal would be none to pleased if this happened.
Virginians with me! Who will come with me?! - Lewis Armistead, July 3rd, 1863
SouthernSteel
Reactions:
Posts: 529
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:07 am

Re: Bayonet Charges and Casualties

Post by SouthernSteel »

The possible fixes we have been discussing are numerous. First, I believe there is an increase in casualties the closer an enemy unit gets to a firing regiment, but I don't know how substantial this increase is nor do I know if those values can be modified. We have also proposed the possibility of volley fire to increase this effect (hold volley until 15 yards then decimate). The morale bit is tough to gauge because a charging unit's morale I would have to say would be sky-high, although taking casualties without the ability to retaliate would take its toll.

Another proposal required that units in column within a certain distance of enemy lines automatically form into line. Column charging was done away with, but now Seal just TC's his regiments and snakes them around and through the enemy regiments. This goes to show that exploits will be tried regardless of any fixes implemented, but no reason not to try.

Robinson (Muleskinner) is (or should be) working on writing up a proposal to change some of the concepts in Garnier's campaign. Primary amongst these would be a revised recruitment method so that those who abuse their divisions don't have the men replaced immediately. If they shatter their regiments, those regiments will take a long time to recover and to do so would have to be pulled from the front lines. I will leave the rest so as to allow him to fill in the blanks.

Yet another (partial) fix is to restore artillery to its levels of effectiveness in the stock game. That way, cannister will really tear into these mass charges. Currently its effect is heavily neutered (in my opinion) plus we've been observing the issue of many guns not firing cannister at all. Still, a regular compliment of artillery for a division (12 guns max) all firing cannister would absolutely decimate an entire enemy brigade in a very short period.
"The time for compromises is past, and we are now determined to maintain our position and make all who oppose us smell Southern powder, feel Southern steel."
Jefferson Davis, 1861
Sharpe55
Reactions:
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 5:23 am

Re: Bayonet Charges and Casualties

Post by Sharpe55 »

That is another thing that should be addressed with this--->column charges. If a unit is column charging into a unit that is unloading into them in line, they should take even more casualties than if they were just charging normal since they are nice and compact together, presenting the ideal target for both cannon and riflemen. The ill effects of column charging were well shown in the Napoleonic wars. Since rifled muskets offered more than double the accurate range, columns should get ripped to shreds.
NY Cavalry
Reactions:
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 7:49 am

Re: Bayonet Charges and Casualties

Post by NY Cavalry »

I am pretty sure that with the last patch the casualties inflicted on troops in column formation has been increased. The developers are aware of the column charging going on in MP play. I believe casualty rates should be increased further when fired into at close ranges. It's too bad that when a brigade is advanced to attack an enemy line that the regiments usually automatically go into column formation. With all the accuracy this game tries to achieve they didn't quite get that right. I like seeing long lines of infantry advancing in line not column formation. I'll take it if I must, the game is great in most respects.

I am working on a OOB where I put some cavalry in it for those of us who like the idea of using cavalry to watch the flanks and do some scouting, but in testing Seal ran them all in column formation right for the enemies guns. He had all of his cavalry wiped out in the first 15 minutes and then when he was done charging his division of infantry the game calmed down and turned out to be a good fight. The point being the cavalry was dropped out of the OOB and cavalry is unable to be played in MP because of its unhistorical effects on any game due to tactics employed by some.


I am not sure how much more the developers can do. Ultimately, it comes down to how the players play the game. We have used a gentleman's agreement in the past, but many players will argue that those types of agreements do not work.
Last edited by NY Cavalry on Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Turbotay
Reactions:
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 5:24 am

Re: Bayonet Charges and Casualties

Post by Turbotay »

I see no reason to pull cavalry out of home-made OOBs purely because of one player's misuse of them. In a true MP environment, all that would do is handicap the abuser's side. After one side loses its use of cavalry through mis-management and gamey/crap tactics, it loses the best tool to use against enemy cavalry action, who is probably using their horses in a better and more responsible manner. Sure, in the beginning, everyone will need to mind their artillery a little closer if Seal is in command of a cav unit, but that would only last a good 10 minutes or so. The troopers simply won't hold up like infantry will when Seal's tactics are employed upon them.

--
Muleskinner
User avatar
RebBugler
Reactions:
Posts: 4252
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:51 am
Location: Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas

Re: Bayonet Charges and Casualties

Post by RebBugler »

It's too bad that when a brigade is advanced to attack an enemy line that the regiments usually automatically go into column formation. With all the accuracy this game tries to achieve they didn't quite get that right. I like seeing long lines of infantry advancing in line not column formation. I'll take it if I must, the game is great in most respects.
It's not on the stock toolbar, but the toolbar I made for MP play has the new LINEHOLD formation commands built in with split formation buttons. We provide alternatives through mods, they're obviously ignored, and you guys complain... :evil:

Maybe you don't like my toolbar, that's cool, then build your own, this game provides all the tools necessary to enhance play.
Bugles & Flags Gettysburg - Toolbar, Flags, Scenarios, and More...
RDBoles
Reactions:
Posts: 472
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Bayonet Charges and Casualties

Post by RDBoles »

Hey Reb I love your tool bar, Er, that could be construde the wrong way. But it is great any how. This wimpering over Seal is fun to listen to. What one needs to do is be more like Grant and find a solution that works. IMHO
Move Forward
KG_Soldier
Reactions:
Posts: 1028
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:43 am

Re: Bayonet Charges and Casualties

Post by KG_Soldier »

Hey Reb I love your tool bar, Er, that could be construde the wrong way. But it is great any how. This wimpering over Seal is fun to listen to. What one needs to do is be more like Grant and find a solution that works. IMHO
Yeah. . . it's not as if Seal is the only player who runs forward in columns. Doesn't bother me because it rarely works out well for the hard charger.
RDBoles
Reactions:
Posts: 472
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Bayonet Charges and Casualties

Post by RDBoles »

Agree on that.
Move Forward
Post Reply